![]() ![]() By testing it on a few files I can't say. But I don't know if it's really incremental, I mean as much efficient and time/bandwith saver than Rsync. But in an other hand it's not native in windows, clients like cwRsync, Deltacopy, Unison and maybe Qtdsync seems not to be fully reliable (?) and dont support utf8 without changing dlls - Qsync seems fully functionnal for windows, easier to configure, and offers versionning what I don't really need. ![]() Here is what I've understood: - Rsync is a very good protocol saving bandwith by only synchronizing the changed part of files, and QNAP integrates a Rsync server. But I've read so many things about sync between Windows 8 and QNAP NAS that I'm a bit lost now. My wich: Thousands of pictures (around 450GB - 14000files) on my PC (multi OS but windows 8.1pro mainly used) to work on it => sync/mirror at each change to TS-420 (what I'd like) => full backup each month on TS-101 About the backup, I can keep on using NAS to NAS Rsync replication from TS-420 to TS-101, except if somebody has a better idea, so the last point is not an issue. Hello, I've been looking for the differences between Qsync and Rsync, but didn't found what I want to compare solutions and choose one.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |